codecov-commenter
commented
3 weeks ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Please upload report for BASE (
develop@3fae486). Learn more about missing BASE report.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #38 +/- ## ========================================== Coverage ? 86.04% ========================================== Files ? 18 Lines ? 2179 Branches ? 0 ========================================== Hits ? 1875 Misses ? 304 Partials ? 0 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/bcgsc/pori_python/pull/38/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=bcgsc) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/bcgsc/pori_python/pull/38/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=bcgsc) | `86.04% <ø> (?)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=bcgsc#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
See https://www.bcgsc.ca/jira/browse/KBDEV-1259 Temporarily disabling some scenarios in ipr annotation test test_annotate_structural_variants_tp53()