Closed granthoff1107 closed 5 years ago
Hi @granthoff1107,
Could you please try out v5.0.0-beta-1
. I've added OAuth support.
https://www.nuget.org/packages/Coinbase/5.0.0-beta-1
Check the README page for details.. Please let me know if it works.
Thanks, Brian
:black_circle: :dizzy: "Black magic... bla-a-a-ack... black magic..."
I’m reviewing this from my phone so it’s hard to see everything. But it looks like you don’t provide raw access to the request from the api endpoints.
That’s fine in most cases but when using the Endpoints from OAuth occasionally you’ll need to supply a CB-2FA-TOKEN header to add 2 factor and replay a request such as in the Transfer api
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 1:40 AM Brian Chavez notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi @granthoff1107 https://github.com/granthoff1107,
Could you please try out v5.0.0-beta-1. I've added OAuth support.
https://www.nuget.org/packages/Coinbase/5.0.0-beta-1
Check the README https://github.com/bchavez/Coinbase page for details.. Please let me know if it works.
Thanks, Brian
⚫️ 💫 "Black magic... bla-a-a-ack... black magic..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SnlsTtUZK0
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bchavez/Coinbase/pull/30#issuecomment-436146997, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMsMnX-_rWyxkVArMfcWvyqVBon-fp27ks5usS7OgaJpZM4YNml2 .
Thanks, this saves me a lot of work. I'm in the process of refactoring my local examples. I only found two Issues with the current beta.
When I'm done refactoring my local examples I can make a pull request.
If you get a chance let me know your preference on how I should write it.
Should the Transactions Api Take in 2Fa Token.
Or would it be better to allow an options param which has an action to to modify the FlurlRequest,
the later would be more versatile in case in the the end users need to add other headers etc.
Once, I get my examples updated I'll start testing more but thanks for putting out the beta when you did!
I just now pushed some code that promotes the CoinbaseApi
as a FlurlClient
.
So, usage should remain the same, but you can mutate the headers before sending your request. IE:
//using OAuth Token
var client = new CoinbaseApi(new OAuthConfig{ OAuthToken = "..." });
var create = new CreateTransaction
{
Amount = 1.0m,
Currency = "BTC"
};
var response = await client
.WithHeader(TwoFactorToken, "ffff")
.Transactions.SendMoneyAsync("accountId", create);
Hold tight for a few more minutes and I'll send out another beta release with the updated changes. :sunglasses:
:car: :blue_car: "Let the good times roll..."
Thanks, this should work perfect. I’ll test this out in a bit and let you know
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:04 PM Brian Chavez notifications@github.com wrote:
I just now pushed some code that promotes the CoinbaseApi as a FlurlClient .
So, usage should remain the same, but you can mutate the headers before sending your request. IE:
//using OAuth Token var client = new CoinbaseApi(new OAuthConfig{ OAuthToken = "..." }); var create = new CreateTransaction { Amount = 1.0m, Currency = "BTC" }; var response = await client .WithHeader(TwoFactorToken, "ffff") .Transactions.SendMoneyAsync("accountId", create);
Hold tight for a few more minutes and I'll send out another beta release with the updated changes. 😎
🚗 🚙 "Let the good times roll..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BDBzgHXf64
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bchavez/Coinbase/pull/30#issuecomment-436477428, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMsMnT0WM1KRFBl3EE_SK43UXnIZ-Gbdks5usj-5gaJpZM4YNml2 .
Hi Grant,
Just published v5.0.0-beta-2
here:
https://www.nuget.org/packages/Coinbase/5.0.0-beta-2
Let me know how it goes. If all goes well, I'll promote beta-2 to as the latest release.
Docs have been updated on the README page
Thanks, Brian
:chocolate_bar: :cookie: :lollipop: Ronald Jenkees - Stay Crunchy
I've added support for OAuth. Adding Simple Error Handling. Simplified Constructors Everything should be backwards comaptible
This method seemed wierd to me seemed like this should be post only why would someone add a json body to a GET Request?: