Closed emjshrx closed 1 year ago
Thanks, good call. I'll review it this week. While I do that if you can, please scrutinize the other RPCs as well. I know this is a tedious and boring task so no pressure.
Thanks, good call. I'll review it this week. While I do that if you can, please scrutinize the other RPCs as well. I know this is a tedious and boring task so no pressure.
Thanks @theanmolsharma . Also I noticed the coverage in RPCs are quite less so can make a test suite for them as well.
Changed the test to be in the right file and ran a formatter on the file
Changed the test to be in the right file and ran a formatter on the file
Please revert back the formatter changes.
Tested ACK
since this is a breaking change, we must also include a release note in the CHANGELOG.md anyone who is using this API regularly for their application will get wrecked if they upgrade and don't comply.
since this is a breaking change, we must also include a release note in the CHANGELOG.md anyone who is using this API regularly for their application will get wrecked if they upgrade and don't comply.
Thanks for bringing this to notice @pinheadmz . Have made the changes.
Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.01
:tada:
Comparison is base (
b005869
) 69.55% compared to head (350e6b0
) 69.57%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Changes the returned json attribute from 'estimatesmartfee' rpc to align with bitcoind docs . Also added a crude test to verify the same.
Fixes https://github.com/bcoin-org/bcoin/issues/1153