Closed tleedjarv closed 1 year ago
This seems conceptually ok, with two comments/questions:
- I wonder why we are publishing a 4.08 build at all. (I can see why we build for CI)
Unrelated to this PR but I agree, we shouldn't do it. I imagined we still keep it for the next minor release for sake of consistency but drop it for the next major release.
- "Linux" is a bad name (although pre-existing), because it's the kernel not the operating system</>. More importantly, these are for particular versions that assume a lot, and thus we should perhaps be labeling it ubuntu if that's what it is.
I agree and will change to "ubuntu".
Since there are no longer tens and tens of packages published, there is no need to automagically construct package names. Simplify the logic and form of names. Most importantly, there is no need to include the compiler's version (nor options) in package name.
Previous names looked like:
Now names would look like:
(dev snapshots)
(I also want to add the underlying release version to the dev snapshots, but that's for future)
The name forms are proposals and subject to discussion (or bikeshedding), of course.