Closed jkbktl closed 1 year ago
It's really unfair to compare lossy and lossless optimizations. Of course lossy is going to win!
That said, I do intend to provide some more options for the image optimizers in the future. It's just a little lower on the priority list than shipping 2.0.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 13, 2013, at 6:12 AM, kotycz notifications@github.com wrote:
I love using CodeKit for compiling LESS and CoffeeScript files, but it's useless for image optimization. It's just not working as well as expected.
I did a test with random images. I compared some services for image optimization.
Here are the results:
Optimized images from Kraken.io and tinyPNG are unrecognizable from originals, so there are some options to improve this feature. (Here are all images in ZIP to see image quality: https://www.dropbox.com/s/1x15g3y3mk2qfdm/image_optimization.zip)
So I would love to see some better algorithm for image optimization.
Please don't get me wrong, it's not important, it's just nice-to-have.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Maybe you can look into adding ImageOptim (http://imageoptim.com/)?
I love using CodeKit for compiling LESS and CoffeeScript files, but it's useless for image optimization. It's just not working as well as expected.
I did a test with random images. I compared some services for image optimization.
Here are the results:
Optimized images from Kraken.io and tinyPNG are unrecognizable from originals, so there are some options to improve this feature. (Here are all images in ZIP to see image quality: http://goo.gl/z4xEEg)
So I would love to see some better algorithm for image optimization.
Please don't get me wrong, it's not important, it's just nice-to-have.