Closed dirkx closed 5 years ago
I don't want to increase the board size at all. The back concerns me. It could tend to rub on the Y axis and there is not much space, especially if a second row of CPU pins is added.
Here is a possible overlapping footprint, that allows you to chose barrel or terminal block.
Splendid - that would work. Would be nice to also label the silk screen.
Just rechecked, tried and find that a screw terminal just next to the bolt hole for the casing and right of the 'V1" label at the back of the board works well - and 'balance' wise is nicer than the current barrel connector location.
I don't think it will fit after the dual footprint is added.
Also keep in mind the cover needs over a 1mm clearance around the perimeter.
I decided not to implement this idea. It does not fit my design goals of simplicity and portability.
Would be nice to have two screw terminal holes in addition to the normal barrel style socket. With +12v/GND labeling. For balance reasons - having it in the middle back of the board at the bottom may be nice.