Closed marromlam closed 3 years ago
We have wide versions of these, but maybe you are using the Term variant, then they will look small. This is by design.
Those look really nice! I am using the non Term variant (I think). I just basically use these lines in my kitty.conf
:
# Iosevka font {{{
font_family Iosevka
bold_font Iosevka Bold
italic_font Iosevka Italic
bold_italic_font Iosevka Bold Italic
font_features Iosevka -calt +dlig cv93=3
adjust_line_height 2
# }}}
I get exactly this picture I print A and 1, just to compare them.
I use kitty 0.22.2 and Iosevka 9.0.1, both of them directly installed by homebrew
So Kitty is shrinking the glyph :( I think you may report this bug to Kitty, the glyph is correct, but it made it small.
Not sure if kitty is shrinking the glyph since it's behaving well with a different font - in this case Cascadia Code. Or maybe I'm just thinking too simple ... ;)
I noticed a while ago that kitty seems to shrink glyphs that are too big for its character cells. This can be a problem for ligaturing fonts etc. Maybe it isn't always happening, maybe there are different circumstances that cause it to happen or not, but I definitely know that kitty shrinks glyphs.
As the "enclosed letter - space" ligature is implemented in Kitty, closing this issue.
I recently started using Iosevka since ligatures issues with kitty terminal were fixed. I was using Victor Mono and I set the vim mode I am currently in with N, I, V, R... in inverted circle. My problem is that with Iosevka the symbols I see are really tiny wrt. the ones I got with Victor Mono. Furthermore, if I try numbers in inverted circles, I can see them properly.
Would it be difficult to implement these symbols? Thanks! 🅐 (U+1F150) 🅑 (U+1F151)...