Minor follow up to #104. When I set the worker_prefix for the tests I introduced a minor issue where if a test were to fail then future tests would use the same worker_prefix and would fail as there were more workers than expected.
I've address this problem by introducing a unique identifier into the worker_prefix which avoids this problem. Additionally, as a convenience to package maintainers I used the same identifier between tests and included that identifier in the resource names to make it more obvious at a glance if multiple failures are from the same test run.
Minor follow up to #104. When I set the
worker_prefixfor the tests I introduced a minor issue where if a test were to fail then future tests would use the sameworker_prefixand would fail as there were more workers than expected.I've address this problem by introducing a unique identifier into the
worker_prefixwhich avoids this problem. Additionally, as a convenience to package maintainers I used the same identifier between tests and included that identifier in the resource names to make it more obvious at a glance if multiple failures are from the same test run.