Closed haberdashPI closed 1 month ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 93.55%. Comparing base (
99468ca
) to head (603ca8f
). Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Awesome! Thanks @ericphanson.
I ran into some CI issues here as well. Seems as though there is a bug in the current release candidate of Julia:
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/55978
I'll make your suggested changes and await a response to that issue.
Julia hash versions 1-3 have a number of components that make them unstable when Julia upgrades and in fact, they break sometimes when being compiled under Julia 1.11. (In normal use I seem to be able to call versions 1-3, but the tests fail in various ways that look like they are related to generated functions). We've just built a new hash version that should be much more stable and work on Julia 1.11 (#58), and the maintenance burden of keeping 1-3 working on newer Julia versions isn't something I have the bandwidth for.
Running tests in 1.11 also revealed a subtle bug in buffering, based on a I misunderstanding I had about the
IOBuffer
API. From what I can tell this did not lead to any correctness issues on earlier versions (because I was carefully resetting buffer state to make sure buffer positions lined up with the start of the array), but I was not following public API, and so it broke on 1.11. This was fixed by usingtake!
instead of the gymnastics I was going through before.