Closed neilramsay closed 9 years ago
I think AWS has created some confusion around this resource type name (ie, "::Logs::" instead of the marketing name "::Cloudwatch::Logs" or whatever) but I think your convention to follow them is the correct way to go.
LGTM
I agree that AWS has created some confusion there, and there are also areas that need to be expanded, as new features have not made their way in to CloudFormation. Let's proceed with what we have at the moment, and raise feature requests with AWS, once we are up to par.
CloudFormation for CloudWatch Logs resource: