Closed beanumber closed 1 year ago
Yes, I think they wanted section 5 to be betting only.
If we were to move biometric to the opportunities section like what they suggested, not sure if this would fit in here, since we said "it will likely never be published" about biometric, so it doesn't provide opportunities for public work.
Yeah, good point. I'm OK with cutting it. @gjm112 ?
I say we cut it rather than move it.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:19 AM Ben Baumer @.***> wrote:
Yeah, good point. I'm OK with cutting it. @gjm112 https://github.com/gjm112 ?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/beanumber/wire21/issues/46#issuecomment-1369890511, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIZJJMBJHCYJWTOZE4D5YTWQQ7QPANCNFSM6AAAAAATPYGZXU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
-- Gregory J. Matthews, Ph.D. Data Science Program Director Associate Professor Department of Mathematics and Statistics Loyola University Chicago E-mail: gjm112 -at- gmail.com Blog: StatsInTheWild.com Art: ArtPal https://www.artpal.com/statsinthewild OpenSea: @statsinthewild https://opensea.io/accounts/statsinthewild
Is this a 4th big idea, then?
My interpretation of this is that they're saying that the inclusion of the biometric stuff is a distraction, and that we're better off cutting that out and making this section explicitly about betting market data.
Thoughts?