Closed GuyBaele closed 6 years ago
The mu's are of direct scientific interest, since they are the relative weights of the evolutionary rate. The nu's are merely a computational trick that supposedly makes sampling more efficient.
No reason why we couldn't log _nu_s as well as _mu_s.
Yeah, but logging the nu's serves no purpose to the end user, unless they're interested in the detecting mixing problems. My understanding is that the nus are just a computational trick; they're hard to interpret. Maybe best to avoid confusion and just log the mus.
Didn't mean to close it.
Logging both for the moment.
Using the new parameterization, we're operating on the 'allNus' but still logging the 'allMus' which is kind of strange to me. Additionally, this leaves me puzzled as to how generalized stepping-stone sampling should work? Ideally, I'd like to construct working priors using the 'allNus', so that would mean logging them. Is it out of the question to log both?