Closed beaugunderson closed 3 years ago
Merging #138 (2d6ddc4) into master (d37f763) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #138 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.04% 98.04%
=======================================
Files 9 9
Lines 564 564
Branches 82 82
=======================================
Hits 553 553
Misses 3 3
Partials 8 8
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Ξ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ΓΈ = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c6670c6...2d6ddc4. Read the comment docs.
@pcafstockf can you verify this works as you expect it to?
@pcafstockf can you verify this works as you expect it to?
Looks good.
I did not notice that I had used mjs
instead of esm
(have to go back and fix my own GitHub projects) π
My only comment would be that using esnext
instead of es2015
means you will be tracking a moving target.
FWIW: I cloned the bg-simple-modules branch, built and ran all the tests. Then diffed with my PR to review, and npm linked. Angular seems to use the esm as expected, and all my tests that use ip-address look good.
π
@pcafstockf oh great call re: esnext vs. es2015--I will change to es2015 (es2018 seems like an option as well, but unsure of the compatibility implications)
edit: ah, this is for the module
property specifically, so basically anything post-es5 and pre-es2020 is the same, and es2020 adds support for dynamic import
and import.meta
; es2015 still makes sense to me as the value π
combines the best parts of the PRs by @pcafstockf and @napei (thank you both!) to enable hybrid CJS/ESM builds
closes #131