Is it possible to handle non-existent field names in a nicer way?
The python backtrace is ugly.
% retrieve_run_report --accession PRJNA275974 --fields run_accession --fields wrong_name
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin/enasearch", line 11, in <module>
load_entry_point('enasearch==0.0.6', 'console_scripts', 'enasearch')()
File "/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/opt/python3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 722, in __call__
return self.main(*args, **kwargs)
File "/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/opt/python3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 697, in main
rv = self.invoke(ctx)
File "/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/opt/python3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 1066, in invoke
return _process_result(sub_ctx.command.invoke(sub_ctx))
File "/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/opt/python3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 895, in invoke
return ctx.invoke(self.callback, **ctx.params)
File "/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/opt/python3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/click/core.py", line 535, in invoke
return callback(*args, **kwargs)
File "/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/opt/python3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/enasearch/__main__.py", line 353, in retrieve_run_report
file=file)
File "/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/opt/python3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/enasearch/__init__.py", line 653, in retrieve_run_report
file=file)
File "/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/opt/python3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/enasearch/__init__.py", line 633, in retrieve_filereport
check_returnable_fields(fields.split(","), result)
File "/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/opt/python3/lib/python3.6/site-packages/enasearch/__init__.py", line 136, in check_returnable_fields
raise ValueError(err_str)
ValueError: The field wrong_name is not a returnable field for result read_run
bebatut
commented
7 years ago
Is it possible to handle non-existent field names in a nicer way? The python backtrace is ugly.