Update Folder Structure for Network Participant (NP) Logs

[emmayank]

Issue Details:

Problem Statement:

The current folder structure lacks organization for Network Participant's implemented examples, making it challenging to manage and locate specific workflows implemented by NPs.

Proposed Solution:

Update the folder structure to include a dedicated "NP Logs" directory, with subdirectories for each Network Participant. Each NP directory should contain subdirectories for specific workflows (e.g., search, select).

Benefits:

• Improved organization and clarity for NP examples.
• Simplified navigation and maintenance of NP-related workflows.
• Improved Collaboration: Any new Network Participant (NP) joining the project will have ready-made references available on how other NPs have implemented specific use cases.
• Enhanced Documentation: Documenting the logs will contribute to better spec governance, compliance, and transparency. It will also serve as a valuable resource for building test cases for Network Validation.
• Knowledge Transfer and Training: The documented logs can be utilized for training AI models in the future, aiding in the generation of use-case-specific JSONs. This promotes knowledge transfer and ensures a valuable resource for future development.

Current Folder Structure:

• API
• Docs
• Examples

Proposed Folder Structure:

• API
• Docs
• Examples
• NP Logs
  • Network Participant Name
    • search
    • select

Additional Information:

• Consideration for future NPs can be made by creating subdirectories accordingly.
• Ensure backward compatibility with existing examples during the migration.

[faizmagic]

@emmayank , Can you please have the draft and the master branch in sync. currently it is not in sync

CC: @vishi24 @ravi-prakash-v

[faizmagic]

@emmayank please also add a small section in readme file providing a description about the different high level folders in the repo and what each one will contain. This will give clarity to user on where to look for what information.

[emmayank]

@faizmagic , let me create a separate issue for this. Once the required change is verified will push the code.