Validating PULSE Specification against the Beckn Core specification v 1.1.0, validating examples against the updated PULSE specification

[rajaneeshk90]

Problem: The example JSON are not consistent with the specification. For instance:

• In on_search the message.provider is outside the message.catalog. As per the specification, it should be inside the message.catalog object.
• Inconsistent Ids are used across the examples for order_id and agent_Id. They should be consistent across the examples.

The details of the issue can be found in this issue page: https://github.com/beckn/PULSE-Specification/issues/24

Changes made:

• Moved the message.provider inside the message.catalog object of the on_search json.
• Made the order_id and agen_id consistent across all APIs.

Related ticket: https://github.com/beckn/beckn-ui-workspace/issues/483

[emmayank]

HI @rajaneeshk90 ,

I have reviewed your PR. please find the observations below and make the necessary change.

1. /Init ( example) - message.item[0].xinput - Schema is incorrect
2. /confirm ( example) - message.item[0].xinput - Schema is incorrect
3. /rating (example) - rating value is missing
4. /support (example) - support schema is incorrect
5. /on_rating(example) - schema is incorrect
6. /on_support(example) - schema is incorrect

Thanks @emmayank

[rajaneeshk90]

Hi @emmayank

Thanks for reviewing the PR. I have made the suggested changes, please have a look.