Open DrYoungOG opened 1 month ago
Hi there,
human-t2t-hla
), but using human-t2t-hla-argos985
can slightly improve this for bacterial samples at the cost of a very small reduction in host read removal performance.human-t2t-hla.argos-bacteria-985_rs-viral-202401_ml-phage-202401
to minimise the number of bacterial, viral and bacteriophage sequences removed. However you should be wary of using any of the current standard Hostile indexes to study fungi, since many eukaroytic genes will map to the human index and thus be removed.Thanks for your reply!
Please forgive me for asking some potentially foolish questions:
Thank you!
No problem :)
I will consider creating a masked fungal human index, though I can't promise anything
Thanks for your patience. I'm looking forward to the masked fungal human index!
Hi, the software seems very good, but I am new in metagenome analysis and I have questions about the selection of appropriate reference genomes (indexes) when using 'hostile'.
1. I read the "Reference genomes (indexes)" part of the README, and my understanding is: compared with using 'human-t2t-hla', additional reads from the '985 reference grade bacterial genomes' will be preserved if 'human-t2t-hla-argos985' is used. Is my understanding right?
2. I have metagenome sequencing data from human stool samples, and I want to analyze the bacteria, archaea, fungi, and virus in these samples. I have used 'fastp' for quality control, and the next step should be host decontamination to remove reads from the host, i.e. humans (am I right?). Can this step be completed using 'hostile'? If possible, how to select reference genomes (indexes)? Should I select 'human-t2t-hla' for my objective?
Thank you!