Open jannikseidelQBiC opened 2 months ago
Hi Jannik, thank you, this is interesting. From your data there certainly appears to be a problem with how --invert
is implemented. By any chance are you able to send me some (or all) of your test data?
Bede
Hi Bede, the dataset I cannot share. Could you try to reproduce the behavior with another dataset? If it depends on only this dataset this would be also highly interesting.
Best, Jannik
Thank you – that's understandable. I will investigate using other data.
On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 at 07:39, Jannik Seidel @.***> wrote:
Hi Bede, the dataset I cannot share. Could you try to reproduce the behavior with another dataset? If it depends on only this dataset this would be also highly interesting.
Best, Jannik
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bede/hostile/issues/42#issuecomment-2342780609, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHWAAFC3GIBWGFGIMC7BRTZV7QSTAVCNFSM6AAAAABN3ZL4TKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNBSG44DANRQHE . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
Hi and first, thanks for the great work.
I tried to run Hostile to get the filtered result files and the removed read-pairs (Illumina paired-end data as input). What caught my eye is that the two results do not match:
reads_removed
in the first output should be the same asreads_out
in the second (and the other combination).--invert
The commands I used (installation of Hostile 1.1.0 via conda):
It seams that running with the
--invert
flag does a different classification than without. Am I missing an option to set to get the same results?Thanks in advance!
PS: Here are the log files.