bedrocklinux / bedrocklinux-userland

This tracks development for the things such as scripts and (defaults for) config files for Bedrock Linux
https://bedrocklinux.org
GNU General Public License v2.0
610 stars 64 forks source link

InstantOS support #186

Closed Titaniumtown closed 4 years ago

Titaniumtown commented 4 years ago

I am basing this off of the arch linux install script. I still have some issues to fix, but expect support soon!

Titaniumtown commented 4 years ago

I'm getting an issue, i don't know what's causing it:

[10/19 ( 52%)] Downloading bootstrap packages [\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\] 100% ERROR: Unexpected error occurred. If you let brl-fetch automatically choose a mirror, it may have chosen a bad one. Try manually providing a mirror with --mirror

Titaniumtown commented 4 years ago

Figured out the issue, something to do with checksums and the like.

paradigm commented 4 years ago

While I don't think it's documented anywhere, we don't currently allow using one distro's mirrors to fetch another distro. The main concern here is the possibility that one distro's mirror would be upset we're using its bandwidth for another distro's purposes, and I don't want to risk it. Using Arch's mirror for Arch things seems reasonable, but using Arch's mirror for InstantOS things might make someone upset.

I know this rules out distros whose files are supersets of other distros, like Mint is to Debian. We don't have a firm policy to handle this at this point in time. We might loosen this brl fetch restriction later, or we might make a different tool to automate converting a "base" distro into a superset one; not sure yet.

Historically there hasn't been much interest amongst Bedrock folks to combine parts of multiple superset distros. Given this, most people just hijack the one superset distro they're interested in and brl fetch whatever else they want. There isn't much pressing need for brl fetch support of superset distros.

Titaniumtown commented 4 years ago

ok, so should this pr just be closed then?

paradigm commented 4 years ago

I don't see a preferable alternative.