Closed wisp3rwind closed 4 weeks ago
@sampsyo @Serene-Arc @snejus @arsaboo @JOJ0 just pinging a bunch of recently active people here.
I have no objections, seems like a good idea to me
Agreed... no objections.
Because I was looking at the corresponding issue, I think we should hold off on this change until October, because Python 3.8 reaches EOL then. If we change it now, we'll have to raise it again a month or two later anyway. Might be easier on everyone if we just upgrade to 3.9 all at once.
@Serene-Arc #5266 requires 3.8 as a minimum, since we are using tox version 4 which requires 3.8 as a minimum, and without it dependency resolution fails.
Dropping 3.7 and then 3.8 later as separate steps may be a less risky option. If I imagine myself as a Python 3.7 user, I'd prefer upgrading step by step rather than having to jump two Python versions. It's also slightly easier for us developers: for example, 3.7 -> 3.8
and 3.8 -> 3.9
upgrades in separate PRs require less mental effort and can be reviewed by multiple people in parallel, in comparison to a single PR which upgrades 3.7 -> 3.9
. This would be more complicated to deal with and we are more likely to miss out on issues.
Good points, let's do that then. We should start planning for 3.9 pretty soon though.
In #5215, our minimum supported Python version came up: We currently state 3.7, but that's been EOL since June 2023. I think we should drop that and allow 3.8+ features. Any objections?