Closed Glide01 closed 2 years ago
I didn't understand what do you mean when you say there is no need to use cookies. Can you clarify a bit more?
It's just that in the current version, for example, if I open a site in a container, not all requests go through the proxy and some escape. I've tried other container proxy plugins as well. Now this new feature of Firefox 94, it may be different.
I think there might be some misunderstanding. It's not Firefox feature. They maintain Firefox Multi-Account Containers extension, and the feature is in the extension.
There might be some Firefox feature/integration with Mozilla VPN, but this is not directly applicable to Container Proxy extension and it's goals. Putting in simple words: I don't have Mozilla VPN and cannot implement integration with it. Also, I don't see a reason, as soon as Mozilla did it.
Thank you for the issue and bringing it up, I totally missed it. This is relevant and interesting topic, but not really applicable.
Regarding request escaping I have a question: Does it happen in all other extensions as well? Or there are some that allow one to set proxy for container and requests do not escape?
Sidebery https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/sidebery/
Lightweight Container Proxy https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/lightweight-container-proxy-02/
SmartProxy https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/smartproxy/
I tried all of these plugins, and the result is that some requests will escape. For example, if I use Tor to access www.nytimes.com, these are the requests that will escape.
So if I want all requests to go through Tor, I need to set up Tor for the Default container.
When the new version of Firefox Multi-Account Containers extension comes out, I will use it and see if it meets my needs.
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/94.0/releasenotes/
Does this mean that there is official API support so that there is no need to use cookies to identify requests from containers?
Thanks.