Closed craigsapp closed 1 year ago
Thank you for this suggestion. One issue here is that your files contain some information that mine don't, most importantly MM information. I plan to add this information in a "second phase" of the corpus in which I will also add the symphonic works and do a review of the piano files. At that point I will also add the MM information. I would like to keep the files separate until then, but will definitely change this when the time comes.
OK. I should fix those files and send you the updates and then they can be merged. They were created around 2004, which is now almost 20 years ago (12 years before VHV...).
@craigsapp I have decided to resolve this issue now to make working with the repo easier on the command line as I am starting to compile a list of issues with the encodings. I have also added a list of the files that you encoded to the README.
It would be more convenient for
ccarh_kern
files to be moved into the opus directory sequence. They are my files and I give you permission to do so :-) (Scriabin is too modern for CCARH, so in a technical sense then are not CCARH files in any case).When you move files around in a repository (on the command-line), it is better to use "git mv" rather than plain "mv". This allows keeping track of the editorial changes in the file; otherwise, when using plain
mv
, you are actually doing a copy and remove (which will cause another copy of the file with the new name to be added to the history of the repository, which in turn will make the repository storage larger than needed).So here are the commands I am suggesting to move the
ccarh_kern
files (on the command line, of course):After this, type
git status
to see the changes, which should all berename
:And then upload as usual with
git commit
andgit push
.