belgif / fedvoc

Federal Vocabularies
3 stars 0 forks source link

Missing properties and classes related to location #23

Closed SvenLieber closed 1 year ago

SvenLieber commented 2 years ago

I noticed that the URI of the class http://vocab.belgif.be/ns/location#Municipality, which is mentioned in the Excel sheet of this repository, does not resolve. Apparently there is no location model on the website vocab.belgif.be.

However, I do find some location-related skos concepts in the authsrc-element taxonomy: https://vocab.belgif.be/auth/authsrc-element/LOCN

What is the recommended way to use fedvoc for location information, e.g. to refer to a municipality?

Furthermore I found some available territory data using skos and terms of the geonames ontology (example Belgium), is this one way to model it? Yet the question remains with which property I should refer to a municipality modelled in such a way.

barthanssens commented 2 years ago

In terms of classes and properties, they can/should certainly be published on vocab.belgif.be, but they should be published as part of https://vocab.belgif.be/ns?lang=en (as OWL/RDFS)

@MarcBruyland can you provide an OWL / RDFS file in Turtle (similar to e.g. infosec https://vocab.belgif.be/ns/infosec.ttl)

smals-vea commented 1 year ago

Request: make the URI’s dereferenceable on the site vocab.belgif.be

Scope: location only or full scope (proposal: full scope)

Check: Vocab Belgif (GDPR - N-Triples) - need for a script to transform fedvoc to triples

Decision: ok to publish the standard vocabulary terms on belgif.

Note: the ICEG URI standard refers to using ‘http’ rather than ‘https’ in the URI.

MarcBruyland commented 1 year ago

First draft publication: See https://vocab.belgif.be/ns/fedvoc?lang=en

MarcBruyland commented 1 year ago

The issue is closed as agreed in the functional workgroup meeting of 2022-12-02.