Modifier templates does not apply

[qfox]

Input code or something about issue background

https://goo.gl/Xm3cWQ

block('a').def()('NO');
block('a').mods()({m: true});
block('a').mod('m').def()('YES');

Feels like it's too late but looks like a bug or useless sugar and we should fix that (modifier templates should apply).

Expected Behavior

'YES'

Actual Behavior

'NO'

Possible Solution

Apply mods/addMods BEFORE def mode?

Your Environment

latest bem-xjst

cc @Yeti-or @awinogradov

[miripiruni]

Today’s version bem-xjst have hierarchy of modes. def() mode is "first class" mode. The rest modes are "second class" modes. It means if a def() template has been defined other templates was not applied. It was done this way because users need full control. How is it suggested to control the templates in your case?

In your example https://goo.gl/Xm3cWQ you would get 'YES' if BEMJSON would be { block: 'a', mods: { m: true } }.

[qfox]

Yep, but we think this is wrong.

[sbmaxx]

Any progress here?

[miripiruni]

we think this is wrong

who are "we"?

[awinogradov]

Look at the likes ;)