search

beman-project / iterator_interface

Apache License 2.0
1 stars 3 forks source link

Should 26 be in the name? #9

Open camio opened 1 day ago

camio commented 1 day ago

If iterator_interface doesn't make the C++26 train, we'll be left in an awkward position with the name of this repository. Should we call it iterator_interface to avoid this issue?

steve-downey commented 1 day ago

We should change it now, rather than later. Definitely before anything takes a dependency on it.

camio commented 18 hours ago

@steve-downey do you want me to go ahead with the rename?

tzlaine commented 18 hours ago

I'm no longer trying for 26 with iterator_interface. I'm not sure whether reflection would be a big win for it's implementation/interface, or maybe no help at all. I can't really investigate that properly with reflection's being such a rapidly moving target. So, this will come back for 29.

camio commented 16 hours ago

I renamed the repository to iterator_interface. There's a bunch of files in the repo that need to be changed as a result, but I'd like to do it after my two outstanding PRs get merged to avoid conflicts.