The BCI results that you gave me do not come with species labels. (Or, rather, the species identifiers e.g., "hybapr" get stripped off when constructing the data set.) That's a bit unfortunate since I can't say which species --- latin binomial -- is increasing fastest and which is going extinct.
Is it possible to correspond your species to the original codes? One problem I envision is that you have more "species" than there are in the original dataset because, if a species enters twice as an immigrant it gets recognized as a new species. So then you'd have to call it "hybarpr-1" , "hybarpr-2" or something.
The BCI results that you gave me do not come with species labels. (Or, rather, the species identifiers e.g., "hybapr" get stripped off when constructing the data set.) That's a bit unfortunate since I can't say which species --- latin binomial -- is increasing fastest and which is going extinct.
Is it possible to correspond your species to the original codes? One problem I envision is that you have more "species" than there are in the original dataset because, if a species enters twice as an immigrant it gets recognized as a new species. So then you'd have to call it "hybarpr-1" , "hybarpr-2" or something.