Open OwnageIsMagic opened 1 year ago
I don't know if this is true. I think it is a bit different from the SO link you post.
In that SO post, it clear the SynchronizationContext of the original thread, so after await, it could run on a different thread.
It is like using ConfigureAwait(false)
, which was exactly what npgsql try to achieve
But here we actually give it a context and create one if there is no context.
so after await, it should go back to the original thread.
@maxisam SynchronizationContext
is thread local
And DetectBlockingSynchronizationContext
doesn't guarantee await
will return to the same thread (it even doesn't override Post
/Send
methods)
@OwnageIsMagic I guess I am confused about how await work. I thought await always return to the original context and that is tied with the thread. That is why we don't use configureAwait(false) for UI related code, because it will use any available thread from the thread pool. But if we only use await, it will return to the original thread if there is a context involved.
https://github.com/benaadams/Ben.BlockingDetector/blob/fce6c534dfcee6ba8cb3ef74d246211b81f5cbeb/src/Ben.BlockingDetector/BlockingDetectionMiddleware.cs#L31-L42
SetSynchronizationContext
afterawait
ing on task restores context on continuation thread (not caller). See https://github.com/npgsql/npgsql/issues/1593 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44418761/cross-thread-exception-after-async-call/44424562#44424562 @benaadams project seems like not maintained, just for your (and others) information.