Open benjiBase opened 1 week ago
As stated below, optional notations are not considered bugs and the double-headed arrows do not contradict standard UML notation.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Description: Two UMLdiagrams in the Developer Guide contain incorrect notations. The> underline in the images, which is not a valid UML notation taught in this course.
Instead, an association label should be used to indicate the direction and nature of the association between
components.
Logic
component diagram and theParser
diagram use a double-headed arrow bracket <Steps to Reproduce:
Navigate to the
Logic component
section and locate the first and third diagrams.Expected Result: All UML diagrams should follow correct UML notation. In this case, valid association lines with labels should be used to represent relationships instead of using double-headed arrows.
Actual Result: Double-headed arrows are used to indicate relationships, which is incorrect UML notation.
Proposed Solution:- Update the UML diagrams to use proper association labels instead of double-headed arrows to ensure compliance with UML standards.