Open boneskull opened 4 years ago
I am by no means an expert in what is the most idiomatic use of nom, but I'll give you my 2¢.
It appears that under Windows Subsystem for Linux the output of /proc/mounts is close to, but not quite the same as, that of a typical Linux system with two major difference:
Backslash is escaped as \134
. I think your strategy of creating an additional windows_backslash
combinator similar to the escaped_space
combinator and adding it to the nom::branch::alt
in escaped_transform
is a good strategy.
It looks like on WSL the mount options are separated by semicolons ;
instead of commas ,
. Rather than creating another escape sequence for semicolons, it would probably make more sense to modify the mount_opts
parser to separate mount options by commas or semicolons. This could be done by replacing nom::multi::separated_list(nom::character::complete::char(','), ...)
with nom::multi::separated_list(nom::character::complete::one_of(",;"), ...)
.
Hope this helps!
@benkay86 Thanks for the feedback. I guess I didn't realize the semicolon-delimited stuff was proper mount options (as /bin/mount
would recognize them), and thought they were just some weird windows-specific bunkum. but I suppose gid
and uid
are valid options!
Would you like me to send a PR? I'm probably not going to be the only person using WSL to go through this tutorial.
If you would like to send a PR I would be happy to test it on my native Linux system too.
Hi,
I found this tutorial while looking for
nom
tutorials. And Rust tutorials. This one seems to be the most up-to-date and well-written, and is essentially my first try at Rust. So thank you!I had tried the tutorial on my WSL2 install (Ubuntu) on my Windows machine. But the parser fails at runtime, because of this weirdness in
/proc/mounts
(pasted verbatim):You may understand why this fails at first glance, but I didn't, so I needed to figure it out (which makes for an even better tutorial, IMO).
This is how I solved it.
Like our
escaped_space
, we need a new function to handle\134
(it's a backslash, which is totally not confusing at all). I think it should display as justC:\
:I added this to the tuple passed into
nom::branch::alt()
:This seemed to work OK, until I had to parse the mount options, which failed because
\;
is invalid (see paste from/proc/mounts
above). I added yet another parser, and added this to thenom::branch::alt
call:and
(I was not sure what to name either of these functions.)
At any rate, the tests I've written against the
/proc/mounts
entry pass (but I haven't had a chance to actually run it on my windows box yet). Here's the one forparse_line()
with different data:Note: I found the following causes the my test to break, because it's not returning the correct type of
Err
result (it expects one fromtag()
, notchar()
, just liketest_escaped_space()
):The compiler didn't complain about this, which I found unusual, since it usually complains about everything. Assuming we're not deleting this parser, what would you have done? Update the unit test, write a new trait, etc.? I don't know what's idiomatic (yet).
I'd love if you could show how you may have tackled this problem. If you like, I can send a PR with changes for this environment, and we could also discuss the implementation that way. Or not!
Anyway, thanks again for this tutorial.