search

benklop / microblog-purple

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/microblog-purple
GNU General Public License v3.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Reply appears to require a leading @name. #176

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
The reply-to functionality on status.net appears to require the @name lead
the message.  One of the nice things about status.net, however, is that you
can reply conversationally rather than artificially.

Could you perhaps keep the in_reply_to parameter even when text is added
before the name?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Jason.Ri...@gmail.com on 28 Jan 2010 at 2:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I have no idea how to change this from defect to enhancement. And I can't see a 
way
to *enter* an issue as an enhancement. augh. Sorry.

Original comment by Jason.Ri...@gmail.com on 28 Jan 2010 at 2:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Hmm. This is intentional. It's a way to "cancel reply". 

May be canceling reply might be put in the context menu instead. Until then this
feature will still on.

Original comment by somsaks on 25 May 2010 at 6:50