Closed scholzie closed 3 years ago
There might be a more robust way to handle this, and the additional creation of a list at L#190 isn't strictly necessary, but it gets the job done without cluttering up the for
loop.
Sorry for the delay. Thanks for this. I'm happy to merge as is, but if I would love to some how move this logic into an abstraction layer so that deconz-specific logic is abstracted away from the procedural code.
The documentation says that this action can handle multiple queries passed into it when separated with a
|
, but it looks like that wasn't actually implemented anywhere. This enables that behavior, and (should) resolve #51.