Shouldn't the exclusion column handling happen before removing rows with Nan?
I couldn't figure out why my sample size was being reduced so much until I stepped through the code and realized that it doesn't care about the exclusion feature list prior to dropping rows.
I generally perform isna checks on my matching features prior to creating the matcher object.
Shouldn't the exclusion column handling happen before removing rows with Nan?
I couldn't figure out why my sample size was being reduced so much until I stepped through the code and realized that it doesn't care about the exclusion feature list prior to dropping rows.
I generally perform isna checks on my matching features prior to creating the matcher object.
Thoughts?