search

benmontet / k2-characterization

Stellar/planet properties and confirmation of some K2 planets
0 stars 0 forks source link

Planet parameters #3

Closed dfm closed 9 years ago

dfm commented 9 years ago

I've added a notebook where I use the values from dartmouth_params.txt and my MCMC samples from Paper 1 to measure the properties of the 2 planets from Crossfield et al. It looks like I'll need to take longer chains in order to fully sample the distribution but it doesn't look too bad so far. The results are more or less consistent with what they get even though the stellar parameters in our table are somewhat different than their spectral results.

I'll add some text to the document next.

Link: http://nbviewer.ipython.org/github/benmontet/k2-characterization/blob/master/planet_properties.ipynb

benmontet commented 9 years ago

Okay that sounds great to me! Looking forward to seeing what they all look like once we are ready to run with stellar properties.

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Dan Foreman-Mackey < notifications@github.com> wrote:

I've added a notebook where I use the values from dartmouth_params.txt and my MCMC samples from Paper 1 to measure the properties of the 2 planets from Crossfield et al. It looks like I'll need to take longer chains in order to fully sample the distribution but it doesn't look too bad so far. The results are more or less consistent with what they get even though the stellar parameters in our table are somewhat different than their spectral results.

I'll add some text to the document next.

Link: http://nbviewer.ipython.org/github/benmontet/k2-characterization/blob/master/planet_properties.ipynb

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/benmontet/k2-characterization/issues/3.

benmontet commented 9 years ago

The table titled "Planet Properties for all Objects of Interest" doesn't have all objects of interest in it. It appears to have 32/36 planets.

benmontet commented 9 years ago

(Also I changed the format very slightly)