Closed benmontet closed 9 years ago
I'm not using an upper mass limit, but I imposed an upper distance limit of 500pc, which would likely exclude giant solutions...the Dartmouth grids as I'm using them extend to ~3.7 Msun.
Okay. I will note this in the text.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:12 PM, timothydmorton notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm not using an upper mass limit, but I imposed an upper distance limit of 500pc, which would likely exclude giant solutions...the Dartmouth grids as I'm using them extend to ~3.7 Msun.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/benmontet/k2-characterization/issues/8#issuecomment-77224326 .
Dan Huber claims 201257461 and 201929294 are giants. The former has a logg from RAVE which is consistent with a halo giant, while the latter comes from reduced proper motion.
This might explain some of the weirdness in the fit for 201929294. @timothydmorton, what's the upper mass limit in the Dartmouth isochrones as you use them? It looks like the default is only a couple solar masses, so if these are giants, they might just not be in the parameter space covered by Dartmouth models.