Open bennycode opened 10 years ago
I think it's not about the JSON-Mapping, it's more about the HTML-Markup on the website. Google never gets our JSON's directly, just the HTML-Markup. But we should provide at least the same information as in the schema in our JSON's, if this is what you mean?
Yes, you're absolutely right. It is intended for the HTML markup. Sorry. But maybe we can make use of the naming conventions in "Schema"?
Example: We have a "previewImageUrl" here: http://www.welovecoding.com/rest/fhb/v1/playlist/16 But in Schema it is called "thumbnail".
Sounds good. Let's do it! ;)
As it changes our domain model and database structure, etc. I will put it back to the backlog as it isn't that important.
Check if we can make some of our REST mappings compatible to objects from http://schema.org/.
Example: http://schema.org/VideoObject