Closed giorashh closed 9 years ago
Yep, fair enough. Any ideas as to what a more sublime-y set of defaults would be? I’m not a ST user, so I’m not sure what the conventions are.
Cheers, Ben
On 13 Dec 2014, at 11:32 pm, giorashh notifications@github.com wrote:
It's safe to assume sublime_user != emacs_user. Pernicious defaults.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/benswift/extempore-sublime/issues/3.
Anything that's not part of the core binding is fair game I suppose. Emacs packages have the same collision issues only ST doesn't seem to support mode-specific bindings which make it worse.
This works for me in ST3, btw.
Aside, I'm reading through all your extempore blog posts (fantastic!) and seeing the occasional niggle. I'd be glad to post a PR cleaning up nitpicks if it's backed by a repo somewhere.
Hey there
I’ve put my blog source up https://github.com/benswift/biott https://github.com/benswift/biott here, pull requests are definitely welcome.
Cheers, Ben
On 15 Dec 2014, at 12:17 am, giorashh notifications@github.com wrote:
Aside, I'm reading through all your extempore blog posts (fantastic!) and seeing the occasional niggle. As it's the defacto docs I'd be glad to post a PR cleaning up nitpicks, if it's backed by a repo somewhere.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/benswift/extempore-sublime/issues/3#issuecomment-66912954.
Fixed in 21c45d
Great. Will definitely send PRs for the blog.
It's safe to assume
sublime_user != emacs_user
. Pernicious defaults.Update: Related ML thread.