Closed sahansk2 closed 4 years ago
@sahansk2 Can you elaborate on this? Like show what we currently have and why it isn't visually appealing
(base) sahan@sahan-GA-78LMT-USB3:test$ git gud levels --all
All levels and skills:
0. Introduction (intro)
├──X 1. Welcome (welcome)
├── 2. Configuring (config)
└──O 3. Initialization (init)
1. Basics (basics)
├── 1. Introduction to Commits (committing)
├── 2. Branching in Git (branching)
├── 3. Merging in Git (merging)
└── 4. Introduction to Rebasing (rebasing)
2. Rampup (rampup)
├── 1. Detaching HEAD (detaching)
├── 2. Relative References I: Using (^) (relrefs1)
├──X 3. Relative References II: Using (~) (relrefs2)
└──X 4. Reversing Changes in Git (reversing)
3. Rework (rework)
├── 1. Cherrypicking (cherrypicking)
└── 2. Interactive Rebase (irebase)
4. Mixed Bag (mixedbag)
└── 1. One Commit (onecommit)
5. Extras (extras)
└── 1. The Octopus Merge (octopus)
6. Rewriting History (rewriting)
└── 1. An Easy Level (easy)
Load a level with `git gud load`
My personal opinion is that this looks just fine, but X
, O
, and P
were implemented just so that we could merge #241. This may or may not be adequate for our purposes, so an issue was in order.
Okay, let's accept this as "fine" then and re-open if we ever think we want to improve
32 has been implemented, but the indicators are currently just ASCII characters.
It's a relatively safe(?) assumption that most terminals these days are UTF-8 compatible, so we should see if there are any UTF-8 characters that we'd want to use to indicate progress. The indicators should be relatively consistent across platforms (Windows/macOS/various Linux), and the indicators should be consistent with each other across platforms.