Closed sahansk2 closed 3 years ago
It might (probably will) make sense to split this up into multiple PRs
If you'd like multiple PRs, would you also like multiple issues for this? E.g. "Test user methods using webbrowser", "Test user methods related to loading", "Test assert initialized methods", etc?
Yes, I think that makes sense. Obviously, there would be many issues, and writing the issues might take as long as it takes to simply write the test, so do what you feel is right. There should either be a pull request or an issue for each test
What we could do is make a new "meta-issue", similar to what #238 is. Each checkbox could be a method in the GitGud object.
Going off of this, we could maintain another branch user_tests
on this repository, and people open up testing PRs to merge to user_tests
. Once all the tests are in and everything looks set, we merge user_tests
into master
. This is similar to what the intro
branch (or the add
branch, I forget) was like a while back.
I'm not sure what's best, so it's your call. As an aside, should this PR be closed?
I think we can open a meta-issue (along with other issues)
I don't think we need to make a separate branch for the tests, I think we can merge them right into master when they are done.
This PR can stay open until there exists other issues/PRs that make use of the useful comments that are here
Stale/closing
Fixes #197
@benthayer Could you verify for which methods you would like tests?