Is the row dimension of the design matrix really in TR? It may be, but 3500
TR's for one subject seems like a lot - just making sure the units are correct
lot's of "will do" in the analysis: how much of this is feasible with only
1 week left?
I don't understand section 3.3.1 --- "all the training set of data is used to
model with the corresponding part of the design matrix" is unclear to me
Why ridge regression? Since your design matrix is so sparse, would a
regression with an L1 penalty (instead of L2) be more appropriate?
The point of delaying the due date for the draft was so we could give
feedback on the analysis. At this point, a lot of work is required to get
rid of that "To be continued"