Closed berkleysayaka closed 3 weeks ago
To analyze discrimination patterns in the DMV area, I want to focus on the following variables from HMDA data:
Updated variables names: Income: This can show whether or not there is discrimination by income when it comes to loaning money. Sex: This can assist in revealing the gender bias in lending. Race: This can be used to identify racial discrimination in the provision of mortgages. Places - Geographic unit: Comparing the lending data for various areas in the DMV region - Likely census tract/ county code Age: This can go a long way in explaining whether or not age-biased mortgage lending exists. Lender(Financial institution): Examining data by lender shows differences in the behaviors of different lender companies.
Overall, this webpage highlights the importance of HMDA data in promoting fair lending practices in the mortgage industry.
HMDA Data: Identifying and Analyzing Outliers | FDIC. www.fdic.gov/bank-examinations/hmda-data-identifying-and-analyzing-outliers#:~:text=Information%20collected%20under%20HMDA%2C%20including,to%20support%20implementation%20of%20the.
[Housing Finance Policy Center]
Housing Finance Policy Center | Urban Institute. 17 Oct. 2024, www.urban.org/policy-centers/housing-finance-policy-center.
[Detecting Racial Bias in Mortgage Lending Using Machine Learning]
“Fighting Discrimination in Mortgage Lending. |” MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 30 Mar. 2022, news.mit.edu/2022/machine-learning-model-discrimination-lending-0330.
In-depth analysis of specific frauds. 1-1. Fraud patterns: In what cases are false income statements being made (e.g., self-employed, those with side jobs, etc.)? How fraudulent collateral valuations are carried out (e.g. fraudulent appraisals, overvaluing collateral properties, etc.) 1-2. Scale of damage: How much financing was fraudulently carried out through false income declarations. The amount of loss incurred by financial institutions due to fraudulent collateral valuations 1-3. Cause analysis: Why is this type of fraud so prevalent (e.g. lax screening standards, lenient penalties for fraud, etc.)
Analysis of specific regions or attributes: Focus on specific regions or attributes such as low-income groups or minorities 2-1. Unequal impact: Are people from specific regions or attributes more likely to be victims of fraud 2-2. Are they being denied loans or forced to take out loans with high interest rates?
Systemic failures: 3-1. Do existing regulations adequately protect people from certain regions or groups? 3-2. Socio-economic factors: How do poverty, education level, place of residence, etc. affect the incidence of fraud?