Closed mlafeldt closed 10 years ago
As in #87, it might be better to use the fpm_attributes
helper instead of implementing every single attribute in fpm-cookery. @bernd, what to you think?
Jup, sounds good!
Jup, sounds good!
Done!
Reading https://github.com/bernd/fpm-cookery/pull/87#issuecomment-44944613, I think I misunderstood you. Having PEAR-specific attributes wasn't bad after all?
I would just start without any PEAR-specific attributes and only add the ones that are used frequently as attributes. Or are all of them needed every time? :smile:
Fair enough. Take a look at 8d8b3bc.
Thank you!
You're welcome. Now looking forward to a new gem release! :)
I just released 0.24.0 to rubygems.
<3
Note on the attributes: With this PR, all attributes supported by FPM can be passed via an fpm-cookery recipe. I'm not sure if this flexibility is required or how attributes are normally handled (they're missing in most other package types).