Open berndbischl opened 10 years ago
Yes. Some steps cost nothing because they only use the initial design (and those costs are already listed in the corresponding step). And yes, some features were veeeery expensive - as I stated within my thesis. Maybe I should give you the thesis back again ;-)
Yes. Some steps cost nothing because they only use the initial design (and those costs are already listed in the corresponding step).
I got confused here. The FEATURES need the initial design step so there are no FEATURES without costs.
And yes, some features were veeeery expensive - as I stated within my thesis. Maybe I should give you the thesis back again ;-)
Please give me a set of steps which are likely to work well for prediction but are somewhat cheap. Like Marius did for SAT. So we can use them in the experiments.
Actually, I am not sure how well the models would work without the two expensive feature steps (local search and curvature). However, as those two groups are soooo expensive, I suggest to drop them.
Please dont close when we dont have a final answer....
I still need to decide the step set
Why? We talked about it last Friday... :-)
@berndbischl Can this be closed now?
I will use this later to finally discuss bbob. whether it is completely ok.
We need to do 2 things:
I thought, we've already decided about the default feature steps:
Well, maybe you proposed these, but - because I had no time - I never ran on BBOB again.
It is also good that they are now written down here.
They are also mentioned in the config-file :-)