Open berntpopp opened 5 months ago
This is actually true for all genes. The status "re_review_submitted" and "re_review_approved" are only tracked in the table re_review_entity_connect. In the standard curation approval views all status and reviews are displayed which casues this "bug". This is also related to the problem of "re_review_approved" not being saved as some curators do not use the dedicated approval view for that.
Possible fix in logic:
Description
In the re-review process for
lamb1
, there seems to be an issue. The entitylamb1
is appearing in the approval list prematurely, before it has been officially submitted for approval by the reviewer.Steps to Reproduce
lamb1
in the approval list.lamb1
has been submitted for review.Expected Behavior
Entities should only appear in the approval list post-submission for re-review.
Actual Behavior
The entity
lamb1
is visible in the approval list before submission, indicating a potential flaw in the submission or listing process.Additional Context
This issue may affect the workflow and efficiency of the re-review process, necessitating a prompt fix.