When I changed the values for bhd_lower & bhd_upper and checked the output, the impact for bhd_lower & bhd_upper was always identical (see screenshot)
Unfortunately we didn't have any check implemented for that specific function call, so we can't know if that was always the case or whether this error got introduced at some later point after initial implementation.
Identical results in geographic iteration of
attribute_health()In the file
testing_Rpackagein the chunksingle exposure value with multiple uncertaintieswe do an iteration usingattribute_health()which runs without error. However in the function call the same values are used forbhd_central, ..._lower & ..._upper(see below) https://github.com/best-cost/best-cost_WPs/blob/3d5b3fe6f5fc41927957df21dfbe21fac2eb1f6f/r_package/testing/testing_Rpackage.Rmd#L175-L192When I changed the values for
bhd_lower & bhd_upperand checked the output, the impact forbhd_lower & bhd_upperwas always identical (see screenshot)Unfortunately we didn't have any check implemented for that specific function call, so we can't know if that was always the case or whether this error got introduced at some later point after initial implementation.
@ungatoverde Can you investigate?