Open irisoren-sg opened 2 weeks ago
@rebecca-wodcke-gad I just realised that this issue relates to the changes the continuous review and maintenance edits that you added in #228 .
in #216 @Hurstharrier and I discussed this separately, and thought that rather than in the lifecycle chapter, the text re: review would fit in Delivery chapter, as it discusses details rather than the "high-level" which is what is how the Analytical Lifecycle presents the stages. The text you added is great, but do you think it should stay in Analytical Lifecycle/Move to Delivery, or be included in both in some way?
@irisoren-sg @rebecca-wodcke-gad - I think regular review of the model is important for models using AI methods such as neural networks.
@irisoren-sg the text I added covers the whole cycle rather than just delivery e.g. you may want to reconsider the scope or communication when re using. If you think all of it or some of the detail should move to the delivery section, I don't feel strongly about it
Add to QA culture does the model continue to be calibrated appropriately, this is particularly important for black box models? Design The process for reviewing inputs and calibrations should be planned in the design stage.