Tools to add/remove from book

best-practice-and-impact / qa-of-code-guidance

Guidance for quality assurance of code for civil service researchers and analysts.

https://best-practice-and-impact.github.io/qa-of-code-guidance

Other

74 stars 18 forks source link

Tools to add/remove from book #156

Open rowanhemsi opened 1 year ago

rowanhemsi commented 1 year ago

Consider adding poetry and removing Travis from Tools page. Consider adding a note to say that Rgovcookiecutter is still quite early in development

rowanhemsi commented 1 year ago

Second sentence here raises a more general point - do we want to include packages that are still early in development? The benefit would be to reduce the chance of duplication, but we may want to be careful about seeming to recommend packages that may not yet work. A compromise may be including WIP packages under a subheading or adding a "work in progress" note

Jacobb164 commented 1 year ago

Do we want to separate out early development tools and recommended? Under the early development tools we can cavate that they are useful but likely to change frequently.