Open fables-tales opened 10 years ago
While I totally agree with that I'm not sure such a prescription falls under style which I define as something like "different syntax for expressing the same behaviour". Isn't this a more fundamental design prescription? If so should this sort of thing be included?
I guess it depends. Is this limited only to objective style, or causing good design to fall out of style guidelines?
What about:
nil
, it's almost certainly not duck typed the same as the thing you're actually returningnil
s returned by third parties in null objects or maybe monads?