Closed pestaa closed 13 years ago
GCC felt a lot more comfortable when it didn't need to compare a signed integer to an unsigned one on line 369. :) Judging by the implementation file, this method receives unsigned char anyway.
Looks good to me. Just checked the .cpp and the .h and you're correct. Perhaps it was a mis-edit.
GCC felt a lot more comfortable when it didn't need to compare a signed integer to an unsigned one on line 369. :) Judging by the implementation file, this method receives unsigned char anyway.