Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by roozbeh@google.com
on 16 Jul 2014 at 6:49
Original comment by roozbeh@google.com
on 16 Jan 2015 at 6:00
Original comment by xian...@google.com
on 11 Feb 2015 at 7:43
I have drawn alternative shapes. The intersection of strokes has moved to the
right, making the "nose" larger and rounded. Please let me know if it is better
or not.
Jelle Bosma
Monotype
Original comment by jelle.bo...@monotypeimaging.com
on 16 Feb 2015 at 10:03
Attachments:
@pathumego, can you take a look at the PDF and answer his question? Thanks
Original comment by jshin@chromium.org
on 18 Feb 2015 at 6:47
Hi Jelle,
I have got confirmation from script experts that the after version is better.
Please move forward with it.
Original comment by xian...@google.com
on 19 Feb 2015 at 4:54
Fifth letter from the right in the initial comparison seems to be more ideal.
The slant still seems to be present in the after version.
Original comment by bhagyasi...@gmail.com
on 23 Feb 2015 at 7:27
Added a second alternative version, which adds another step to the change. I
hope this will do. The font that is compared with looks like Malithi, which has
very different top vowel construction. Noto has to keep a relative wider top
stroke for the two vowels to stay clear.
Original comment by jelle.bo...@monotypeimaging.com
on 25 Feb 2015 at 10:44
Attachments:
After 2 dose it !
I agree with you about top part construction.. But there is a certain slanted
appearance left in the head. Which i think was intentional as you mentioned.
You only changed the nose right? Or have you revised the head part as well?
Thanks! and sorry about delay in response.. (BTW, yep, he Na next to Noto is
Malithi )
Original comment by pathum...@gmail.com
on 25 Feb 2015 at 8:43
The image shows the difference between the first variant (light blue
background) and the second. I assume "dose it" is a positive response... the
medicine that provides the cure.
Original comment by jelle.bo...@monotypeimaging.com
on 26 Feb 2015 at 1:03
Attachments:
Yep :) It is a positive response.. thanks for the image
Original comment by pathum...@gmail.com
on 26 Feb 2015 at 1:17
fixed in the new version, which will be available soon.
Original comment by xian...@google.com
on 31 Mar 2015 at 7:01
Thanks!
Original comment by pathum...@gmail.com
on 31 Mar 2015 at 7:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
pathum...@gmail.com
on 16 Jul 2014 at 6:46Attachments: