Closed erikbern closed 6 years ago
This wasn't super useful and caused a bunch of clutter. Also often incorrect.
Should probably be renamed "cdf".
As a next step, will add some sort of "ppf" method which returns the inverse of the "cdf" – this will be useful for sampling events.
Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 91.237% when pulling 50ebdb8147ee7101231644ef132c5cc2722bb891 on remove-methods into 3b5bba9148bdc5742cc79f1a175d5486660cda68 on master.
This wasn't super useful and caused a bunch of clutter. Also often incorrect.
Should probably be renamed "cdf".
As a next step, will add some sort of "ppf" method which returns the inverse of the "cdf" – this will be useful for sampling events.